Khan

The beautiful spring of democracy

«Let a hundred flowers bloom; let a hundred schools compete»

Mao Zedong

When nature wakes up in the spring, no one is surprised. Flowers appear in the fields. The birds are singing. The nondescript-looking representatives of the fauna are divided into factions.

Unexpectedly, bright characters appear from the general mass of the same type. Against the background of white snow, bright coloring would attract predators. Now, the brighter the better. These are males! Females choose friends with the brightest plumage. This is a guarantee of the health of the future offspring.

What kind of spring makes people wear bright clothes?

Amazing! Expensive branded clothing performs the function of a painted tail.

But this is the case with young people.

And what should middle-aged people do? How can the elderly attract the young?

After all, old people cannot wear torn jeans and highlight bald spots (although such overly youthful characters are increasingly coming across)

«Scars adorn a man»

That’s what they used to say. The time for fights and duels has passed. War is not welcome. And in general, there is no war! All people are for peace. We don’t mind. Scars are no longer decorations. Instead of scars, people wear tattoos

Nothing can decorate a modern man like that, only money!

And to have money, you need to have power.

Americans ask, «If you’re so smart, why not rich?»

This expression is an American cliche for today, too, and does not keep up with events.

It is better to say: «If you are a Democrat member (a variant of a Republican, a member of the Democratic Party), why don’t you have millions?

If you want to be rich, support democracy all over the world – the surest way for today is to not look for pieces of peace all over the planet, that is, where there is no democracy yet, but instead, immediately become a Russophobe.

Therefore, the American cliche about wealth, as an accurate indicator of the mind, is better to immediately philosophy, «If you are a Russophobic, why didn’t you get rich»?

Do you think members of the American Congress need democracy?

Democracy is a reason.

With howling about democracy, interested congressmen, Americans cherish their dreams of wealth in their heads (the Biden clan, Pelosi did it well). With each billion dollars allocated to Ukraine, all participants in the transaction become richer. The allocation of money is a pyramid scheme. The «inventors of help» receive the most. Officials in Ukraine collect crumbs from billions, millions of dollars. Everyone should fight so hard for freedom! Parasites cannot be torn away from this project by any means.

Russia is an outcast country

Why is Russia an outcast?

There is no other country in the world where totalitarianism is a culture, only in Russia. In Russia, people have lived in a collective community for many centuries. Russia is a country of snow and eternal cold. There are a lot of bears in such permafrost. Russia is a country of totalitarian lepers – how else them to protect yourself from bears? Although you can make a fortune in Russia on Putin. That’s why «if you’re a Russophobe, why didn’t you get rich»? The Soros Foundation’s agents, these nobodies dressed up and spoon-fed, could ask precisely the same question. (If they were Americans). These greedy little people from underdeveloped areas are just representatives of philistinism. In the past, beggars. They like never seen anything in your life but want now live beautifully.

Everyone wants to live beautifully.

Birds spread their tails in the spring, so people worldwide look for democracy to wear branded clothes and «live like people.»

Sweet poison

«A successful businessman will never become a good statesman; his only interest is the pocket, not the people.»

F. Roosevelt

Advertising is the engine of trade… and politics.

The seller praises his product and, at the same time, the buyer. Advertising inflates the product, the manufacturer, and the buyer of the product altogether. If the market trader does not praise the buyer, he will not make a profit. From here, all buyers become like perfection: short ones become tall, full ones become slender, and plain ones become ideal in beauty. That’s where free personalities come from, then just «personalities» who have the right from birth. The origin of the crowd of «personalities» as the sellers’ interest – is it clear to you?

Any conservative society (any society of tradition, traditional society) has clear criteria for social distinction. In other words, traditional society is distinguished by the presence of apparent strata, classes, and castes (the latter two have the most negative connotations). Therefore, any momentary relaxation during the purchase is pleasant in itself. A short, fat, and ugly customer wants to buy more goods and listen to the flattery of the huckster.

So, you don’t have to go to the market, and you don’t have to buy anything else. You can immediately choose your favorite seller as the mayor of the city.

The moment of transition from mass purchases to mass communication «for love» was described by Dale Carnegie. He wrote a training manual for all young buyers. From now on and forever, people try to sell themselves as a commodity with exceptional politeness, services, and silence – when another speaks. Those who are ready to listen and praise have a better chance, as Carnegie recommended to all low, fat, and other moral freaks to be hypocrites and chameleons. Whoever praises you will win!

That’s how playing with petty self-esteem turned into a means of control.

I’ve already told you. Before this tool took shape, people learned to sell and buy everything. The easier, faster, and more profitable it is, the more pleasant it is. Hence, the first mayor of Huckster, as I said.

From the mayor of the merchant to the government of the rootless is not very far either. And this mechanism also has a psychological spring of mass petty selfishness.

The first thing the government of Liberals and Democrats did was anathematize the old regime and state control, ridiculed officials, and conservative values. There is no duty, no service, no morality, no homeland. There is only one goal – pleasure, making a profit, and making a profit to have fun – laissez-faire!

The victory of upstarts and rootless people worldwide testifies to the fertility of all sorts of rabble. In addition, it is about the insidiousness and boundless imagination of the lower classes.

Do you think that with the proclamation of the power of an upstart mayor, a government from the smallest rootless rabble, all conservative values have disappeared?

You will be surprised. This miracle will be for you. Hierarchies do not disappear anywhere, hence classes and castes. And it was precisely because of the general crisis created by every hypocritical liberal creature because of their coveted insatiability, genetic greed (in the first generations anyway) – about it Karl Marx wrote in his Manifesto. The free market of philistines highlights and monstrously emphasizes property inequality. Napoleon himself was fucked up by what the French nouveau riche were doing.

All the nouveau riche creatures, without exception, are engaged in imitation of the aristocracy, but they do it pretentiously wildly.

But they can’t be an aristocracy! Couldn’t. And now they can’t.

And they climb into power solely for personal enrichment. To be praised by voters and hangers-on, as if Refags – their new politicians buys from them (but not the goods, but the votes).

Sellers have always weighed a moral crisis in the crisis of conservative values.

When the old elite got old. When the old elite is overflowing with incompetent descendants of heroes.

Be a Kazakh

Where does patriotism come from? Where did the motherland come from?

The same question can be asked: where does despotism come from, and where does democracy come from? In other words, you would know what is what when there is an external and internal migration. When mass migration occurs, everything falls into place. Migrants do not need an old homeland. It abandoned them, and these people betrayed their homeland (such mutual contempt). However, you can’t throw the words out of the song. People are often overcome by nostalgia, and successful people are strongly remembered at home. What is broken cannot be glued together. This is not a sentimental foreplay. This is the clarification of the monster. A migrant never knows the word homeland, no matter how often he utters it in public and does not talk about it. Once betrayed, he will betray again. This is mutual hostility, invisible to the eyes of others. No one will ever see this struggle (just as no one will hear the thoughts of an orphan). It is only in the second generation that migrant children pronounce the word love. You can’t force migrant children back to return to the land of their fathers. From that moment on, democracy is born. That is, democracy is the homeland of all emigrant children, even though they have not yet been born until they know it. But when they are born, their parents try very hard to ensure they get a good homeland, that is, that the children have everything – and what is kindness? That is so that the children have property and land. There is no need for any other care. That’s how all the American Aborigines lost their lands.

The Indians, in turn, could pronounce the word homeland, but not because all the owners’ peoples understood this word. The Indians did not have a homeland like the Europeans, but they had a territory where they hunted. They did not have time to call their homeland their homeland, so they had to have an «Asian despotism.» The one in the form of the rarest wild civilizations of the Maya, Incas, and Aztecs, which was pilloried by the conquistadors and their descendants. In the civilizations of the Maya, Incas, and Aztecs, with one eye, everyone would see the causes of despotism. Despotisms, autocracies, and totalitarian systems are typical of the old homeland of migrants (that is, a world without democrats and their descendants). While migrant children are settling in, they are always democrats and bequeath democracy to the future (and then impose it on the whole world, by the way).

Just like that, we playfully answer the greatest mystery of mankind – where Asian despotism and Western democracy come from.

If you want a democratic system, migrate wherever you can, even to the moon. And there, download the rights to local lunatics. If you can’t move far away, then you are a backward person (at the moment, anyway). But all the nomads left on earth, or their descendants, want to build democracy according to European patterns. It’s like if all the Maya, Inca, Aymara, and Iroquois Indians are dressed in tailcoats – none of this will work. There is an inevitable evolutionary line (accumulation of skills, collection of experience) that cannot be jumped over (as one cannot jump over formations, although Marxist Bolsheviks tried to work miracles)

No matter what the nomads build, what they do not declare, or do not glorify, there will still be nomadism, and there will still be autocracy. Of course, it will differ from the Asian wildness, from the «Asiatic» – according to the Europeanized, but it will still be the khan’s prerogative (if we mean the nomadic Turks, then the Kazakhs as well). Nomads do not understand the word homeland by idea. No, of course, according to textbooks, manuals, and the system, all descendants pronounce this word. But these are all words for the air. Millions of nomads can pronounce this word in the chorus but do not understand (in fact, they will breed corruption of unprecedented proportions). For the concept of homeland to float across the sky at this moment, it is not obliged to travel through the historical epochs of European peoples. The people of the owners who had property came up with this word. First, these people settled down and stopped wandering. Therefore, they divided the plots and put up family signs.

However, what is done is done. The nomads had no experience signing land, but they could put tamga (mark) on the ears of cattle and sign new territories with the hooves of their cavalry. Modern nomads no longer need cavalry (the first cruise missile will bring their warlike fervor back to normal). The nomads gained knowledge. Yes, this is someone else’s knowledge. But this is knowledge. Knowledge allows you to control everything, even primitive instincts. First, to prevent nomads from fleeing to the steppe from responsibility (and today to run around the world for show-offs to show relatives: «I’m here in the USA and standing on the banks of the Thames in London!»).

Even the new migration of nomads worldwide does not make them non-nomads. Although in America, in Europe, all Kazakhs shout, «We are for democracy!». They don’t even realize they’re crying. This is a manifestation of their selfishness (and complexes).

Those who shout, «We are for democracy!» have received property in the first generation. They do not suspect themselves that they are calling, «We do not love our wild homeland of nomads» – the very place where the khan’s power should have taken place. But it did not occur, and the nomads are to blame. The current government declares a «desire for democracy,» but it still looks very much like an autocratic (uncultured, uncivilized) by European standards. And that’s right. This is our nomadic government. And do not run away from it in different directions, imitating white people. The white people have long since fled, which cannot be stopped. The end of the world has already been prepared for all nations.

Let’s build from the material that we have. And immediately do without show-offs.

It would be best if you started with work. We need to start with responsibility.

Happy boors

Why are there many fools and few smart ones?

Because while an intelligent person thinks, fools multiply

So, if you want fascism, force the provincials to flee

The main principle of the right is hierarchy.

The main principle of the left is equality.

Throughout history, people have observed hierarchy, a conservative society that makes up a pyramid of estates. This has not always coincided with justice; in most cases, traditional society looks unfair. But this is an outside view. This is a migrant’s view. The guest will never understand the order in the house, but he can feel the discipline. Maybe a conservative society does not give so much freedom, and the guest will find the air stale and the downcast eyes of the household extinguished. However, discipline is needed to maintain order. Any shift to the left, towards freedom, violates order in every house. First of all, the order of inheritance, literal inheritance, when younger brothers beat up older ones to change the will, literally, when young revolutionaries overthrow old men with the banner of revolution in their hands. But this case is a crisis of conservative morality. Traditional society reproduces quickly; traditional families have many children, and any new invention of technology and officials will face a queue of mothers with hungry children in their arms. The worst answer would be: «You gave birth to them for yourself!» No, they gave birth to them for you! They gave birth to soldiers for you. The time of the long world creates a hidden mobilization; mobilization accelerates after every technical perfection, after every invention.

And to fight with whom?

From this moment, internal migration begins because beggars have nothing to bequeath to their children – heirs without inheritance «attack» cities. Beggars don’t have servants. The revolutionaries are mostly younger. If there are noble teachers for them, they do not follow the queue for ideological reasons. If there are bad guides and no teachers, many impudents turn into loud hypocrites. Even in a so-called democracy, rules are needed. Otherwise, crime will undermine everything (like it does the Latin American mafia; the mafia duplicates the conservative order everywhere). But, as you know, all the «newcomers» and «collective farmers» are orphans and democrats when they meet in the square, first with socialists, then by fascists (or maybe by communists of the Stalinist – Maoist type of communism of the 20th century). Because all visitors have traditional values in their blood (hierarchy and discipline are almost in their genes), they quickly get used to order.

But even in the new column with banners, they feel good. They feel the discipline of their home.

What kind of democracy is this? You are right, and this is not a democracy. Democracy gives millions of Zerefs hope. Who gets registered on the stock exchange, someone who already works at a factory, a company. Someone will be even more lucky – they even buy shares of their companies. At this moment, everyone, not only the visitors, is in a good mood. Prosperity is ahead (that’s what they think)

But these people are vulnerable.

The fascist trend around the world in the 20th century shows only one thing.

The mess in society (country) begins when insignificant people climb up and do not follow the rules. As long as everything is good, as long as there is the first prosperity, they do keep the queue, and it is even profitable to keep the queue. Democracy is an extraordinary society. This is a society of happy boors. But when happiness ends, happy louts quickly turn into fascists. They hate the whole world. All fascists are internal migrants, disappointed at the end of the queue, gentle philistines. New crowds of visitors, looking at them, are also angry, but there is no previous freebie! You can’t live on robbery, theft, and corruption alone. But these are the habits of millions. When bright hopes are dashed, many people begin to draw swastikas on their bodies. There is a systemic queue violation.

The anarchists themselves, who have despised the conservative queue, now want a different order. And they like it if provocateurs call them masters. You are the owners! That’s what they tell people about the gentle construction of civilized orphans. You are a superior race! So you are the owners of this territory. You can skip the queue. These people did not keep the queue at the first prosperity when they got a little rich (and some even a lot). They liked to live with the looting of the state by officials – the same upstarts. Now they are told you are the owners; who wouldn’t like it? Upstart officials can’t think of anything else. They will attempt. But they will turn out to be the mafia again. Hence, there is rapid nationalism, the combat flying squads, and field commanders.

Do you know why warlords seized power in Libya after Muammar Gaddafi Khan?

Because the Zerefs men lack organization, they are all nomadic anarchists. In such a conservative world devoid of order, order is restored. Nomadic anarchists love democracy, they like not to keep the queue when there is no father, when no one is watching. When there is a father, and there are relatives, there will be no democracy.

Democracy is a time of immoralism. Now, I think you are convinced: people who are not adapted to live without order, who do not have the consciousness «this is mine, and this is yours,» love democracy, quickly turn into democrats. And then they are afraid of her. In a democracy, they like the first freebie, the first sip of freedom (all highlanders and nomads behave untied for the first time in the city). But they quickly gather in a bunch at the first danger. And again, they recognize the seniority.

These are just the latest data, the latest facts of our days. Why is Europe the birthplace of old fascism? Because fascism is the quick order of all internal migrants. Europe was the first to lose its kinship. It was in Europe that everything got mixed up – the concept of a nation took place.

Only a socialist Khan can

The trouble is with your officials. They put my funds for modernization, wages, and solving environmental problems in their pockets. The greed of your compatriots killed the miners. Watching their behavior, I was always amazed. How can you hate your people so much?! As long as you have such leaders, the victims will multiply

Lakshmi Mittal

It is not surprising that such officials live according to the feudal principle of the Middle Ages – I will be the first, but I will never be the second. While there is an opportunity, you need to honor yourself with money. And people will respect me not for my principles and honesty but for my money and opportunities.

Democracy is a state, a system, a regime, a society created by migrants.

The more migrants there are, the more democracy there is. It’s a long migration. In this sense, Americans are out of competition. What else could people without roots who fled Europe have built?

If there are half of the migrants and this half is active because of hunger and injustice, these are internal migrants. Thanks to internal migration due to modernization in the 20th century, Europeans gave the world such fresh ideologies of «short migration» – fascism and communism. If you want to look closer, you will find a solid landless peasantry among the migrants. At the very least, the provincials. And the leaders of the Communists and fascists are the children of provincial officials – this is the rule.

Moreover, quite accurately, the Zeremids (short migrants) choose fascism if private property has been cultivated among the people for several centuries and communism if private owners, as people, were not in honor (like Russia). All the countries of Western Europe were ahead of the whole world in democracy and then the inevitable fascism. Right-wing autocratic regimes, not unlike dictatorships, have been established in all countries of Eastern Europe. But these were obviously conservative countries. England and France went through bourgeois revolutions; the populations mixed up with each other so much that the population had only one cult left: money (It turns out that England and France turned out to have an ornate path towards long migration. In addition, the conflict with Russia in the 21st century shows that Germany and France are more like American colonies. This is the result of their defeat in 1945 and the occupation of these countries. Due to the defeat in World War II, Japan was also occupied. Therefore, Japan also has a developed democracy, although the Japanese have not really mixed with their neighbors. This means that the cult of money can be controlled even by deeply traditional peoples if the people no longer have a traditional elite or it is represented purely symbolically).