Maidan in Asia. Kazakhs and Arabs

Don’t trust the nomads. In the example of the Arab Spring

“Privilege is the greatest enemy of the law.”

Maria von Ebner-Eschenbach

Since 2010, the Arab world has been gripped by the “Arab Spring” – a series of anti-government protests, uprisings, and armed uprisings. All Arab countries have moved to one degree or another. Why are the Arabs, not Iranians, Turks, or even Azerbaijanis?

Because the Maghreb countries are located closer to Europe.

If you don’t look at the map, you can see that the Mediterranean Sea separates the Arabs and Europe. Indeed, the Mediterranean Sea and nothing else. But isn’t Turkey and Europe separated by some narrow straits of the Bosporus and the Dardanelles? Why did the Turks behave quietly when the Arabs were rioting in their countries? Maybe someone, some prophet, appealed to the Arabs with appeals? Even if George Soros had changed into an Arab toga at that time and tied a kufiya on his head, no one would have looked in the direction of such a strange “Arab”. Besides, Soros is not a speaker but a financier. He is the patron of these activities in the interpretation of the liberals. In fact, the sponsor of orange coups around the world.

But even this monster of Orangeism was powerless. His money has nothing to do with it. To create the conditions of the Arab Spring, he would need decades of special training. The modest possibilities of a short human life would not allow Soros even to dream that the Arabs were his disciples.

However, what happened?

And the Arabs have strengthened the world camp of democracy with their speeches. At least, they just ideologically contributed to this stereotype: all autocracies will not be saved from democracy. All dictators are waiting for an inglorious end, like the massacre of Libyan opposition fighters over Muammar Gaddafi. The Arab Spring has strengthened the forces of the Orangists all over the world. Following the Arabs, Venezuela, Ukraine, and Cuba became agitated. The Arabs especially strongly supported the forces of the Ukrainian nationalists. Here in Ukraine, Soros and other bankers, close by blood, had a decent base for a coup. Here, Soros would not even need to change into Ukrainian embroidery. His foundations have supported the right people “in the name of democracy” for many years.

But where is a democracy, and where are the Arabs?

Yes, indeed.

The Arabs, even after a series of modernizations, where the monarchies themselves carried out industrialization and Cultural Revolution in the 20s and 30s of the 20th century, did not stop there. The Arabs were impressed by Abdel Nasser’s anti-colonial revolution in Egypt. The Cultural Revolution and Enlightenment contributed to the performance of Arab officers. It was the people who carried out coups. The Arab officers did it. In fact, all coups and elite perestroika are anti-feudal and anti-colonial actions. European colonialists controlled the Arabs through the feudal elite. After the British, French, and Turkish empires collapsed, the Europeans cut the Arabs’ borders according to the rules. Stop!

So there were no formal borders between the Arab feudal states?

Naturally, all these states appeared on the map with the collapse of colonial empires. Before the collapse, historical tribal lands existed. However, it was the informal knowledge of feudal elites about hereditary property. Within the empire, regions, one might say satrapies, were preserved. But the puppet monarchs ruled there. Therefore, Arab officers, many of whom studied at military academies in the West, asked themselves: “Why did we study? What were we trained for?” They were trained for the colonial administration as Arab urbanization progressed. But they went even further. They declared independence.

To somehow distinguish the fate of the Arabs from the Turks and Iranians, you need to understand that since 2010, the chain reaction of Arab coups has been associated with the general psychology of Sunni nomads.

The sudden Arab epiphany is associated with urbanization and Arab socialism.

The Arab movement “for democracy” is associated with the reforms of the Socialist officers. The Arab officers looked at the USSR and repeated as best they could. “As they could” because tribal tribalism was not outlived; tribal tribalism is a very tenacious thing. Tribal tribalism and the informal influence of the feudal elite should have been a solid factor for Muslim radicalism. Muslims do not need the godless communism of Lenin-Stalin because Muslims have their religious socialism. Therefore, the officers could not proclaim the “dictatorship of the proletariat.” They wouldn’t be understood. Another socialist, Hitler, was very popular in the Arab world. It harmonizes with the “role of the individual in history” under the guise of Mahdi, which is, in fact, a banal chiefdom. Therefore, for example, Gaddafi could not build anything except his own Jamahiriya. His oratory distinguished Nasser. But this did not save him from the Muslim Brotherhood.

So. The monarchs sent the children of Bedouin nomads to study military affairs. What happens? They studied to overthrow their patrons. All Arab history, from the late 50s of the 20th century to 2010, has been under the rule of the military – or civil administrations of the Western type. But Arab democracy is fiction – just a showcase. Officers and clerics stood behind the decorative presidents. The best manager for all former nomads is the autocratic leader. And how he calls himself a president by the Western standard, maybe a prophet, so that it is clear to Muslims -this is his personal business.

Most importantly, leadership and dictatorship do not disappear anywhere but return in a new form and with a new name. That’s why the most conservative in this world are nomads, and in 2010, the former nomads rebelled.

The most conservative people suddenly rebelled; something was not quite right. But what?

Is it time for nomads?

Maybe. But when nomads perform, they never look for democracy. It would be best if you understood this from the very beginning.

Democracy is nature in the nomads’ view. Nomads mimic well and adapt to different natural backgrounds. But they won’t tell anyone.

The Sun of the Nomads

In chemistry, there is a concept of catalysts. These substances are added to the mixture so that a quick reaction occurs. The former nomads of the Maghreb might have seemed like radicals to someone in 2010. If you look at natural nomads in general, they don’t care. They are not interested in any idea. In this sense, all nomads, including former nomads who grazed cattle or drove camels in the last generation, are great conservatives. They look more at the sun and the weather; they are interested in comfort for livestock, if I may say so because economic well-being has depended on cattle alone for a thousand years. Cattle are the fate of nomads. If there are more cattle, there will be more authority. This means that the nomads will have many children, and no neighboring tribe will dare to attack.

But what kind of cattle are we talking about? All the world’s nomads have been exposed to urbanization for half a century. In Egypt in 2011, something happened: the population was outraged by the rule of the progressive president Mubarak. This is despite the fact that Egypt’s economy was almost the best due to the tourism business and thanks to the income from the Suez Canal. A fifth of the population lives in rural areas, and these people have been farming for five thousand years. But it is these people who hunt crocodiles and start nurseries. The population of Egypt has grown by seventy million; that is, it has tripled in number. This is the highest increase among African countries in those years. That’s what Nasser’s action and the nationalization of the Suez Canal means! Huge revenues went to the state treasury. No sun and astronomy are needed to have high wheat yields. The tides of the Nile also moved to tenth place, although the entire population of Egypt has depended on this great river for a thousand years. It was at the expense of this population that radical urbanization took place. Thus, the Suez Canal became the main sun of Egypt. The Suez Canal became that new sun and wind that interested all the nomads before and after. Stop! What kind of nomads can there be in Egypt? Aren’t the Arabs nomads? The indigenous population of Egypt is Copts, and now they make up several percent of the total population. What does it mean? Does this mean that nomads will remain nomads, even if they have been sitting in one place for several centuries?

Was there an orange uprising in Iran in 2010? No. It wasn’t because the Persians were not nomads. Were there Maydans in Central Asia? In Central Asia? No, it wasn’t. Cotton is harvested in Central Asia. Highlanders live in Afghanistan. (Mountaineers also live in Kyrgyzstan, but they are sharply urbanized, so there have been several coups. Afghans can be said to be non-urbanized mountaineers; therefore, they are not interested in human rights. Only in Kazakhstan, in January 2022, there was an orange demonstration against the autocratic regime. But why is it so late? Why not simultaneously with the Arabs? After all, Arabs and Kazakhs are Sunni nomads).

In 1937, there were 80 million people in Japan. In 2010, 110 million. In 1956, 25 million Egyptians lived in Egypt. Now, there are more than 100 million. What happened to the Egyptians? What has replaced the hot desert sun for them? As I said, revenues from the Suez Canal dramatically increased the birth rate. The Suez Canal is the sun of Egypt at that time! Any improvement in conditions immediately increases the capacity of life. Why are traditional people born and live? They want to live! All the traditional peoples (the Zerefs in Revkon) have a huge life force because all the traditional peoples lived in extreme conditions. To survive, they had to fight for a thousand years: with nature, then with hunger, with aggressive neighbors, that is, also with mediated nature, because the people of the enemy tribe lived in exactly the same conditions. Those who have more population, especially nomads, are physically stronger. (That is, it turns out: do the Zerefs still live in the Middle Ages? Yes, in the subconscious, the Zerefs live in the Middle Ages. At the level of reflexes, they are forced by tradition to live “according to the precepts of their ancestors.” All Zerefs have a cult of ancestors and old people. Sometimes it’s good. Sometimes it doesn’t look good.) Any change in conditions towards comfort and the traditional population literally gushes with population growth. And why do such people gush with children? To defeat the neighbors and take away their territory. This is medieval informal law, the right of the strong. No one will allow aggressive Zerefs to attack their neighbors in modern conditions. However, local conflicts arise in different places for the same reason: overpopulation. Today, Asia and Africa are showing tremendous population growth. Then, these people migrate to Europe and America. Not all of them; this is a certain rural contingent with no place among his people or tribe because all the places are already occupied.

Madness before the war

War is the main occupation of the tribal world. (Don’t take them word for peace and friendliness, especially today, when all the Zerefs of the world are under the anesthesia of democracy. The Zerefs are not Democrats at all. When there is a lot of food on the table, a plentiful feast, you can brag about anything and fraternize. But the crisis should always come. Warlike genes immediately wake up at that time. And then the brother is looking for a blood brother to take goods away from other people).

Which is interesting.

All peoples at the stage of tribal division are small in number before the arrival of various “colonizers”. These white men just brought innovations, thereby increasing the capacity of life to the local clans.

And now, let’s think about why. A hint is that they are still proud and belligerent. After being captured by the colonizers, tribal peoples began to multiply in number because all the so-called civilizers brought the same catalysts. But which ones? There are good and bad catalysts. First, the bad ones, then the good ones: if the civilizers practice different kinds of genocide, for example, racial genocide. At first, it may be bad, as in the African colonies (but today, the positive aspects of colonization of Africa are also visible paradoxically), If the Zerefs are, of course, able to learn new skills. If they are not capable, and in addition, if the culturtragers are Protestant Calvinists, then nothing would help the tribal peoples. The mismatch of poles and potentials leads at first to deplorable results, even to genocide, as happened with the American Indians.

Modern financial fascists have learned to use so-called nationalism, or even more precisely, the local emancipation of such peoples. They see that such people like to show off. They like to dominate, to be the elite. And who doesn’t want to be an elite? When all the benefits bring you. When any autocrat turns into a local dictator, it is precise to show because the Zerefs have no semitones: either you are at the top or the bottom, and there is no one in the middle. If a catalyst is added to such reflexes, all such people will go crazy. All the people will start shouting about some democracy, which they have never seen with all their ancestors combined because all Zerefs want to be at the top according to the laws of traditional reflection. (Here, they like to talk about primitive democracy and confuse this primitive democracy with trade democracy, when all the ancestors of traders traded, but from other people, everything was decided at the tribal council during the war with neighbors. These are two different democracies. For primitive democracy, war is needed, any force majeure; for commercial democracy, income and profit are needed). It means whoever fought for a thousand years will fight for another thousand years with a “democratic” frenzy. Thus, every Zeref will destroy his people to climb over the corpses to the top of power. The more insignificant the candidate, the less time he needs to be happy at the top; even five minutes is enough. And the democratic catalyst is just pouring this very thought into the crowd – you all are a person! Everyone can. It means everyone can be president. And what is needed for this? It would be best to lay, then trade in the people’s interests to breathe fame for five minutes and maybe money, more money. All Zerefs are violent radicals. So, the lies will be the wildest and most cynical here.

The term flotagia appeared in revcon (a neologism from two words flotation and Refag to understand this process. Refags are people with market self-reflection).

In the first stage, financial fascists support the young nation-states, whose young or conditionally young elite begins to squeeze out cultural former soviet intelligentsia so as not to interfere with what is called democratic reforms (by injecting a catalyst of egoism into their heads). At the same time, leaving only their “savages” in power. This is reforms or whatever else, but the crisis of governance and the ideological desert are creeping up imperceptibly but surely.

In the second stage, when enough has taken place through the gentle squeezing of rivals to forget about them, the ruling elite begins to remember but also insist on obsolete anachronisms. The old history of the Middle Ages is ascending to the skies by local academics. That’s what the bourgeoisie and local people want in the end. These are just the laws of an old, obsolete law that has reanimated market catalysts. This means that in addition to the generic revival, antiquity tribal thinking mores should also be revived with some adjustment to the market and the world’s fascist financiers. It’s just the parliament building and similar structures, which are just large rooms where some people (parliamentarians) just sit and vote. With the revival of the law of old, all its new participants will use the words freedom and democracy fashion (this is just for fashion and for importance; catalysts unleash the language in one direction). There will also be a stock exchange next to the monumental administrative buildings. These fashionable words will not interfere with the resurgent tribal arrogance and belligerence. But to attack an invisible enemy, preparation is needed (while the catalyst excites)

Flotagia is a process when any action in the name of local nationalism leads to a deterioration of both nationalism itself and the conditions of existence of the traditional population. It is enough to look at the countries where nationalism has already been revived and is supported by financial fascists. Nationalism is such a zugzwang for regimes that at the first stage, everything seems to be fine; every one is pleased, but then every move of nationalism will be against the local rulers themselves. Every blow to the cultural traitors and heroes of the imperial and colonial past, like the same demolition of monuments, will revive militancy and make these peoples modern tribes because the main occupation of a tribal hunter is war. The world government also needs it because it allows it to restrain the growth of the population of the cultural periphery.

Flotagia is the replacement of principles with petty egoisms of most of the provincials, who did not know these very principles and did not have time to understand what it is. There are no principles and no choice of means; there is a mad passion, a crazy passion for being like Europeans. But this imitation is, of course, mechanical and material initially. Everyone wants to get rich quickly by imitating the elite

Frog caviar

What is the danger of flotagia thus involving the archaic population in market relations?

The market materializes the archaic energy of competition and destruction.

Blood and kinship play a cruel joke with the archaic population. The same joke is taken under control by external forces. That is why radical Islamism and nationalism, which are super-controlled from the outside, are dangerous.

If we talk about the Arabs of the Maghreb, they had to try everything. Many reform officers adopted nationalism or national socialism. But they didn’t know which side to choose – the West or the USSR. Before the Suez Canal crisis, Abdel Nasser was the best friend of the German National Socialists, who did not have time to escape to Argentina. Some of these “specialists” settled in Egypt. However, the power and authority of the USSR allowed these Arab socialists to talk about socialism in general. (I don’t know, is the Ba’ath Party socialist rather than nationalist? Because the catalysts of socialism still excite local patriotism among the Zerefs. But the catalysts of socialism are still, closer to my reflection, less harmful to Zerefs peoples than the catalysts of democracy).

If the current catalysts increase the capacity of life, then the population will grow rapidly, like in Libya under Gaddafi, Iraq under Hussein, and Egypt under Mubarek.

However, all the leaders of Asia do not take into account one important thing:

The population is growing exponentially, and the benefits of maintaining the standard of living are arithmetic. But all the Zerefs want to dominate! At least to live with dignity and not be disgraced in front of relatives. (That’s why the Zerefs mostly brag about where they work or where the children study at weddings and commemorations. If children study in the USA, then it’s just great!) The socialist catalyst pours equality into the heads, and the democratic one – inequality. Which is better? The question is rhetorical. However, the local native elite is constantly enriching itself, thereby irritating the crowd, which is the main reason for the uprising (in Egypt, the Mubarak clan ruled for over thirty years, which is all tired). People who don’t understand anything about democracy want to throw off this native elite so that the next tadpole becomes a frog (I use the evolution of a frog from caviar into a tadpole and a frog itself all the time in Revcon. If you declare a tadpole a frog, it will still be a tadpole, but he will still become a frog and not something else. The democratic catalyst and his laboratory assistants want the caviar to be democratic right away. It’s impossible. I hope this is clear now).

The outstanding boxer of our time, Meni Pacquiao, built several multi-story houses for the poor at his own expense. Why did he do it? Because he’s a politician now. And perhaps the people of the Philippines will elect him president.

Without a democratic catalyst in the minds of Filipinos, it would have been impossible for some fist-fighting expert to become president.

After a while, children will be born again in this area, and a lot of children and the same problem will arise as if there was no Pacquiao, and he did nothing. But you can say to Pacquiao that Pacquiao’s act of goodwill is a simultaneous act of populism from Pacquiao.

Of course, flotagia excites traditional people to breed (to fight?), but flotagia does not prepare officials at all. Zerefs become officials and steal again, stealing endlessly, like a hungry loader who got into a grocery warehouse.

Why do different crooks get into officials?

This is a different question and, in fact, a problem for my other book (which is being prepared).

Both democracy and socialism work with the lower classes all the time, where there is rapid reproduction. This is probably the scourge of all mankind. Tradition does not give a chance in the face of another aristocracy or local elite for the children of “commoners” to get to the top. So do the commoners, who gained power due to the revolution and coups. They attach only their children and relatives to big money. Does caviar turn into a frog again?

Forerunner

Our people are outraged not by the injustice of life and power but by the creation of a new caste system.

Since the Maghreb, all current Maidan events have occurred on the market civilization’s periphery. In the former USSR, going so also, so today, the Maidan is predictable in terms of the level of urbanization and sudden urbanization after the so-called market reforms and privatization. Who are the revolutionaries leading in the name of human rights and democracy at the end of the global financial pyramid?