Книга Non vowel resources of some good mood - читать онлайн бесплатно, автор Alexander Nikolaevich Borodin. Cтраница 2
bannerbanner
Вы не авторизовались
Войти
Зарегистрироваться
Non vowel resources of some good mood
Non vowel resources of some good mood
Добавить В библиотекуАвторизуйтесь, чтобы добавить
Оценить:

Рейтинг: 0

Добавить отзывДобавить цитату

Non vowel resources of some good mood

One ounce of practice costs one ton of theory.

Words attributed to Mahatma Gandhi

Eugene Ionesco is said to have said: «I saved myself – self-analysis, self-discipline, self-education, self-improvement.»

A manual on non-theoretical (non-laboratory) psychology – is it when everyone who is not a psychologist by education, voluntarily or involuntarily conducts research in the field of psychology independently, based on their life path and experience and documents their research in order to share it with others? High technology does not stand still – augmented reality with virtual glasses will tell you how to disassemble, repair and which nut to unscrew in front of someone who has never done this before – what about augmented reality in terms of psychology, you can here to combine the knowledge of software engineers and those who know how to correctly adjust in any situation?

Valueology is the science of a healthy lifestyle. In 2000, a fashion for a healthy lifestyle (healthy lifestyle) appeared in the civilized countries of all continents: everyone strives to create a beautiful and healthy body – exercise, eat right, but you can’t hear someone talking about healthy lifestyle, because physical health depends from what is going on in the head? Everyone knows that it is contrary to the rules of healthy lifestyle, and few know what is contrary to the rules of healthy lifestyle? What is it, hygiene – who will make a list of what is considered harmful to mental health, like a list with information about what is harmful to physical health? A sea of propaganda of an unhealthy lifestyle is pouring down on you, conduct self-promotion of healthy lifestyle – watch, for example, movies about sports training? How are HLS, Dam Square and Red Square related? Self-propaganda is not only movies about sports, but also viewing on your computer through street online webcams connected to the Internet, what happens in the cities of your dreams, which you would like to visit or would like your family to visit, it gives an incentive to earn money and some not to spend money on chemical stimulants of chemical content (alcohol, drugs), but to save for a trip. You enter in a search engine, for example: «Amsterdam Dam Square webcam» or «Russia Red Square webcam». Initially, the oral list of what is harmful to the psyche is made up by the parents of their children, and if there are no such parents, then there is no list of how immunity is strong for a cub of an animal that was taken away from its mother early because it did not drink its milk? Let’s just say there are people who are programmed for a moderate emotional reaction to stimuli, and how to respond to stimuli to those who are called emotional people, if modern psychologists say that holding back emotions is harmful and that this subsequently leads to inappropriate behavior? To become a psychologist, you do not need a psychologist’s diploma and an office – you need to know life, for this you need to direct yourself to the most standard and most extraordinary places and situations, try to find ways to realize your needs, can anyone become an independent researcher in psychology? Sometimes in some places does politics interfere with the quality of psychological assistance? Can someone who did not burn in the tank in a moral sense give advice on behavior? With age, «direction finding» your and others in the sense of interests? What is the best way to find out – looking at the battle from the sidelines or participating in it yourself? Who is «trampling» the paths of the rules of relationships between people – psychologists, ordinary people, or both? The life experience of someone who gives advice cannot be limited to studying at the institute and working in the office? Does anyone who writes scientific dissertations to improve people’s lives, having seen a drunk man lying in the snow in the window of his apartment or office, come out and help him get home? Unmet needs shorten life? The book called on the road – should everything be recognized in practice? Everyone can change and create their own social norms – not only artists and politicians? Discipline is a decision to do what you really don’t want to do, to achieve what you really want, do you pass by desires alone (sex, alcohol), if any, to achieve another most important desire? War and struggle even in individual minds – the most common psychological conditions in the civilized world are cognitive dissonance (in simple terms – this is the clash of several conflicting beliefs that prevent one decision from being made, sort of like a psychological, ethical or other dilemma) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (actions associated with rituals such as spitting three times over the left shoulder, bypassing the place where the black cat ran, bypassing triangle-shaped lamp or telephone lines foreheads, etc.)? They say that Carl Gustav Jung considered the belief of everyone in something supernatural and the worship of something unknown by a world neurosis? Nobody is your enemy and friend – they just have a «program» of behavior towards you that can be changed? Karl Leonhard coined the term «stuck personality» – forget about everything negative, forget about everything quickly – the psyche is considered ideal, which allows you to instantly forget about everything that is considered bad, and what to do if everything is vice versa, and modern science cannot help this? Why are there extremal scientists among those working in extreme conditions, for example, geologists at the North Pole or extremists who have tested their latest medical products on themselves, and why can’t I hear about extremists among psychologists working in extreme psychological conditions or, so to speak, in the «field»? Come to life as a researcher? What to do when some people have emotional chaos in their head, if they were deceived or offended, and it passes only when the product of this chaos splashes out in the form of negative emotions? The key to psychological comfort and mental health is the fulfillment of desires, regardless of whether they are dictated by higher powers (for example, sexual instincts) or were some people inspired by other people or inspired by themselves (ambition)? The main thing is to find ways to satisfy your desires, and no longer need to look for any other means of existence? Higher forces or nature are your desires, with the help of them they communicate with you and with the help of them they realize their desires? Higher forces or nature realize their plans through your desires? Why should I look for the meaning of life, if everyone has his own, and for everyone everything was decided by higher forces by means of a genetic code and so on: live your desires, any your desire is a desire for higher forces? Fear, an overdeveloped sense of self-preservation, in a word, a lack of frivolity prevents one from realizing one’s desires? Not to pay attention to fear is not a call to what is called recklessness, but a call to not pay attention to fear when reaching any goal? Where does what is called neurosis and phobia come from from the cult of the instinct of self-preservation – don’t often think that something unpleasant can happen to you like a soldier does not think about it in a war? Is frivolity good for the psyche? Some want to emigrate to countries that are considered rich, with a developed economy, so to speak, there is no economy – are there countries that in the past used to «snatch» a large piece of material wealth pie and now use it? If you live in a country considered rich, can you stay what you call an infantile (child) for life? How did material prosperity «sail» to some due to the exploitation of slaves and wars of conquest with the extortion of minerals from the conquered? How objective is the analysis in someone’s works? All psychological problems due to the lack of the necessary information and certain skills – forewarned, then armed – some not warned, who in most cases are some? If you are from that family, which is considered complete and prosperous, then you do not need to look for information on the healthy lifestyles (psychologically healthy lifestyle) on the side – will you be taught a psychologically healthy lifestyle in the family? Do and do the same events affect everyone in different ways? Unlucky for someone who, so to speak, is not prepared for life, or depending on what kind of life and where to live, there are «sweet» places where you don’t need to prepare for anything? If you haven’t been prepared for what is called life, parents, do you need to prepare yourself in order to compete with those who were prepared for life? What kind of «facade» is the cause of most psychological problems for some due to the fact that they only see the «facade» of life, and they don’t have objective information, since they don’t know how everything really works? Does a person study the environment and learn from what he has learned? Does information material turn into thoughts? Is cognitive dissonance simply replacing one person with another, one man or woman with whom you live, on others, a glass or bottle for a family? Let all the flowers bloom or there are harmful sources of information and the information itself – in terms of what is considered psychological health? Harmful information for psychological health and comfort needs to be suppressed, and who benefits from what is considered harmful information? In a global sense, the so-called bad information is beneficial to the competitors of those people who control you? Is it written somewhere that people in the future will become immortal and will ask for death? Some are very worried when someone dies, they get what they call a nervous breakdown, but imagining yourself immeasurable is no less frightening than dying? Excessive caution leads to what is called mental illness: the key to psychological health is to understand that higher powers have already been decided when you die, and calmly do what you want?

Is there a healthy mind in a healthy body or a healthy body in a healthy mind? There are considered undeniable facts that have been announced by scientists that affect life expectancy: a sedentary lifestyle – minus 6 years of life; chronic lack of sleep – minus 5 years of life; overweight – minus 8 years of life; high blood pressure – minus 10 years; smoking – minus 10 years of life; regular intake of alcohol – minus 23 years; drug use is minus 34 years. You can add one more point: grew up in a family called dysfunctional – minus several years?

They used to say that fitness is useful, in 2018 they say that an hour of fitness reduces life by a certain amount of time, what to do and who to listen to?

Some, faced with a power hostile to them, which they cannot destroy, instead of trying to destroy this power, destroy themselves, others long for their death when, as they think, there is no other way to solve the problem, the first and the other is just a conviction by these some?

The material in the work is almost 100% collective and does not pretend to be the new teaching of life, it simply compiles and offers to analyze the statements and behaviors of people from the category of «random acquaintances» and just acquaintances with whom the author had to communicate regarding everything than almost any average person faces in everyday life. And most importantly, those whose statements and lines of behavior, as already mentioned, are collected in the work, considered themselves to be completely satisfied with life by people (they were also considered by those who knew them), therefore, the fact that these people are satisfied with their life, says that they lead a psychologically healthy lifestyle with respect to their own mental component, and this should mean only one thing – their way of thinking and methods of responding to any situation are somehow valuable if this provides them with psychological comfort Hg and does not harm others. Also in the work are materials from other sources indicated in it. Once again, I want to emphasize that all the information in this material is not of any propagandistic nature, it is not intended to offend someone’s interests or insult someone, etc. – is only familiar with the line of behavior, way of thinking, the knowledge of ordinary average people who, as already mentioned, consider themselves and whom others consider to be successful people, and therefore the work is not clearly written in the «teacher of life and student» mode – only an introduction.

According to historical data, earlier, when there were no hospitals and ambulances, life expectancy was 18—20 years, those who were 40 were considered old people. Now in some countries, when medicine has reached the level where for the most part everyone has been living for more than 40 years, another problem has arisen – some are destroying themselves, despite the benefits achieved by civilization associated with increasing life expectancy.

Not only smallpox and typhoid kill people? Parents are deprogrammers who «clean» the brain of a child from harmful programs, are parents like an antivirus program, if they are not there is no protection against «virus» software? Are there parents who themselves are crammed with harmful programs and therefore cannot protect the child from them, as a rule, this happens in the so-called socially dysfunctional families? As a child, I found a book at home «Raising a child in an incomplete family», in which there was a lot of «water», but it was not said that a child from an incomplete family, when he grows up and when he grows up, will have competitors in the form of children from full and full-fledged families – Is there parity between those who have parents and siblings and those who do not have them, can the first achieve what the second can achieve? Do those from an incomplete family or from the so-called dysfunctional family need at least the same level of development as those from a complete family in order to achieve something? You will not become a general, since the general has his own son? When you are alone, you walk alone through life’s obstacles, but when those (parents) who have instincts to help you surround you, you walk without obstacles, or not always like that, because when all obstacles are removed, they become those who are called non-self-reliant?

What to do for those who have not become a scientist and come into life on a common basis or almost on a common basis, since he does not have a parent or parents, he is alone in the family or he does not know how to do anything? For a simple layman, everything can be described as follows: money is needed, and if money is given as a pie, then the chances of tearing a piece out of it are different for those from a complete and prosperous family, and those from an incomplete and dysfunctional family, provided that the needs of one and the other are the same? Life experience is an opportunity to predict people’s reactions to your actions: some do not have close people with life experience, and they are forced to do wrong things because of this? An incomplete family is also the absence of siblings – who can give advice on more intimate questions that some parents do not know the answer to? An acquaintance who is 40 years old, who has never been married, has not lived with a woman or a man, and whom I have never seen with a woman or a man, and who has a mother and father, but has no siblings, periodically drinks alcohol, possibly, due to the fact that he doesn’t have a sexual partner (perhaps because I didn’t specify the reason for drinking), that is, he has an unhappy sex life, because there is no information or the opportunity to establish relationships with a partner of interest to him? There are times when you need to come to the solution of a super-delicate problem yourself, because even in complete families they will not tell the answer to them? A housemate gave birth to a child from a married one, perhaps thinking that she would keep him near him, but he left her and refused to buy a crib for a baby, it turned out that she was from an incomplete family, lived without a father, if there was a father, this would not be happened since father has life experience? A child born in an incomplete family due to the fact that there is no necessary information from a missing family member will have to fill up more «bumps» than those who grew up in a complete, considered adequate family (considered adequate, because complete – this is not always the one that is called adequate)? Living in the next entrance of the house where my relatives live, the guy from the family, which is usually called dysfunctional, went to the automobile bridge and rushed down – died in the hospital, that he from this family contributed to the adoption of the line of behavior that he chose? A work colleague goes to a psychiatrist for antidepressants – is she also from an incomplete family? I ask her a question – for sure, her father left her in childhood. Does it really play a role, where did you grow up and with whom? After all, many great people grew up in an incomplete family, for example, Korolev, the designer of spaceships from the times of the USSR, or were these just other times? Does the historical time in which a person from an incomplete or dysfunctional family lives plays a role in shaping his personality?

Dedicated to all those who are from that place, which is called a dysfunctional family, an incomplete family, those who are called non-self-reliant, and all those who destroyed themselves.

INTRODUCTION, PROLOGUE, FOREWORD AND ACQUAINTANCE

The work does not mean that somewhere someone violates the rights of any social group – simply, according to the author, there are people who lack certain information necessary for a comfortable life.

To learn more, you need to live longer. Some people from science say that after death, everything transforms into a quantum state, and with this comes absolute knowledge of everything, but don’t die in the pursuit of absolute knowledge, you can assure everyone that you should live up to 70 or 80 years, and then in this non-quantum world absolute knowledge will come if not about everything, then in psychology they will surely be complete or almost complete, everything will be decomposed into «bolts» and «nuts» in a social sense.

How to find out the rules of the psychological healthy lifestyle – do you need to ask a person who is happy with his life what he lives with, or does each Abram have his own program? Are signs of following the right healthy lifestyle rules a constant presence of pleasure from life? What is absolute knowledge – the ability to separate the present from the fictional, and 70 years is the time when some finish manipulating you and you start to «load» some? To clearly see the dark and bright sides of life is a purely philosophical concept, and everyone can perceive everything that is happening around him as he wants, but is there an objective reality that is around us – is it like that, and nothing else? Some have their own pseudo-reality, and does it interfere or help? Could it be that someone’s pseudo-reality will become an objective reality? Is there an objective reality? Who can change the «record», change the objective reality to one degree or another – scientists, politicians, businessmen, millionaires, or any person? Any society can be changed the way one wants, people will be the way one who wants and can change the rules of people’s lives – all are suggestible, but only the level of suggestion is different for everyone? The seemingly independent social movements are in fact absolutely all acting in the interests of certain politicians? Higher powers endowed everyone with instincts and other needs, but not all provided with instructions, how to satisfy these instincts and needs – is philosophy a forest that philosophers and ordinary people have been wandering for centuries in search of such instructions? Among some philosophers there are those who have lost their way in the forest of life, in connection with which they are trying to convey to people what does not work in life? Do people continue in our time to learn to communicate with each other? How do you need to live and how not to do it – all this is indicated in the laws, and the laws stem from the psychological needs of people? The one who does not want to live by the law is in prison, the one who cannot, in psychiatric hospitals? Laws are based on the majority opinion about what laws should be? Like it or not, you need to find a compromise when the situation requires it, if you live among people? If you don’t observe ethics and morality, you will annoy others, and therefore both morality and ethics are not just words that are meant to be manipulated by someone, but unwritten laws that follow, like those written, from the psychological component of people – that annoys others shouldn’t show up? The human brain is a very plastic material, and anyone and anything can be molded from a person, but as is commonly believed in scientific circles, a child under 6 years old generally lives almost under hypnosis – is it super hypnotable and suggestible? Does modern man need to live in multitasking mode? Is there such information, recognizing that anyone will change their lifestyle, because it will affect his lifestyle, or does any information change something in everyone? There is always a war with oneself, both in the physical sense – for example, when you endure hunger, observing a diet for weight loss – and in the psychological one, therefore the assertion that the body needs to be given what it asks is not always true, because if it asks alcohol or drugs, and if you give them to him, will it ruin him? Anyone who does not know how to communicate with people and is in a state of chronic pride, he goes constantly «hungry», including «hungry» in the presence of the opposite partner he needs, since he pushes everyone away from himself with his pride? How to properly respond to someone’s attention or questions from someone else? Do you need to be able to protect your lifestyle or do you need to be able to change it? Neurosis and other borderline disorders are the result of a psychologically incorrect lifestyle – how is cirrhosis with a physiologically incorrect lifestyle? Why leadership training, why be a leader? The astronauts are not leaders, although everything is fine with fortitude, and moreover, according to the documentary, their psychological tests exclude the presence of leadership qualities, we need a simple and space-controlled person with completely zero what is called «ambition» – the belief that if not a leader, then this is not good, is this the result of ordinary suggestion? For the sixth time, American doctors successfully performed a heart transplant on a famous billionaire David Rockefeller, RIA Novosti reports – does anyone who enjoys life want to live? By the age of 40, having made a retrospective of his relationship, he noticed that all my bosses with whom I worked for a long time were simple people, the same thing with the opposite sex, and those who were nervous and arrogant quickly disappeared from my life path – this is why, that I myself am like those who disappeared from my path, which means that opposites attract, or aren’t opposites attracted, or in different cases differently? The older the average person becomes, the more he becomes like everyone else – with age, what is called an individual is lost? After 40 years, most people are only interested in material issues – health and money? For those over 40, it becomes more difficult to manipulate, since they themselves can manipulate? Remember that the envy of the blind begins to see, the dumb to speak, the deaf to hear, envy is a natural signal that there is a competitor for what you need? Higher powers have specially invented what is called envy – is this for the presence of competition? Is it possible to consider as manipulation what gives a bilateral, but not a one-sided benefit? What will help people, teaching how to live, material well-being, or both? In some countries that are considered rich, there are many people who can lead the same way of life as kings and kings? When it seems to someone that everything’s bad for him, agents of someone’s influence inspired him or he inspired himself: the tsar or the king didn’t have a TV and a computer before – some don’t understand that they live better now than kings and kings used to live, why then should some people organize revolutions or leave somewhere? In some deemed wealthy countries, young people do not want to work, receive large unemployment benefits and go to other (mainly Asian) countries to look for the meaning of life, but for some reason these young people do not leave to find the meaning of life, working as workers in construction sites, factories and to farms? The word Pasteur comes from the old Russian «shepherd»? National building – can you create a state with people of any beliefs, with those that only you want? What seems strange to some, for others, the norm – feminism, an open family, child-free, the LBBH community, libertarianism, sologamy, etc. – are the social products of only rich states, since there people don’t think about earning money for food but thinks only of spectacles, everything is according to the Maslow pyramid – is all of the above possible when basic human needs are satisfied? Does the term «human syndrome have everything» exist? Is everyone benefiting from the very fact of his existence? Is it possible to change life for the better with the help of information or only with the help of material goods? Happy are those who know and are not afraid to do what others do not know and are afraid to do? In countries with low and average living standards, are relationships different from people in countries with high living standards? Every 6 minutes in the world, one child dies of hunger – they say that this is the official statistics of the UN, which takes place in countries considered to be poor, no one informs about this? As the scientists say, the concept of the passage of time is relative: when it is pleasant from something, it flows quickly, when it is unpleasant, it flows slowly – what should one do to whom endorphins are not produced from anything, and accordingly there is nothing pleasant in life? The reward system donated by higher powers to man is endorphins – are the so-called endorphin «traps» controlling everything? There are people who live in the past, there are people who live in the present, and there are people who live in the future, but there is also a mix, where there is something more, something less? Depression begins when old life strategies are broken, but there are no new ones yet, a person cannot live instincts like animals – does he have to carry any ideas, even those that are considered primitive? They took the drunk to the police – they interfere with life or help to make the right choice? You can look at fire, water and anyone’s extraordinary eccentric acts for an infinitely long time? What governs the life of everyone, what is called fate, or a combination of circumstances? How to study a person in terms of his instincts and emotions, and at the same time to be the bearer of the same instincts and emotions – is it difficult to study robots when the robot itself, or vice versa, does this simplify everything? Who are you, a gangster, but you without a doubt could also be a scientist, if you find yourself in a different environment. Me, you and all people are plasticine from which you can fashion anything; the question is in whose hands this plasticine is, and heredity plays a secondary role? A person is a tube into which you can fill anything, in any percentage of something – why is it not the other way around because you «poured» into yourself or others «poured» into you this and not other information? The words attributed to Hajj Nasredin are as follows: «No matter how you say halva, your mouth will not be sweeter.» Or is he wrong, and vice versa – a person, not only by suggesting someone, but also by self-suggestion, can «blind» any person out of himself? Most people are very suggestible? A person is considered to be someone who believes little and criticizes everything? It has always been fashionable for some to be like others or the other, or is it one of the instincts present in some as opposed to such an instinct as «I am special», or are these not instincts, but the results of upbringing? Raising a child, but do not break his will? Does the fate of the child (and not only the child, but also the family as a whole) depend on the propaganda abilities of the parents? Fashionable for some to be different from the people – am I special? Even the amount of what is considered various mental illnesses is different at different times – during Freud’s time hysteria dominated, in the 20th century schizophrenia, in the 21st century depression and panic attacks? Endogenous depression is a malfunction in the production of serotonin and dopamine. Does such depression happen or is failure a consequence of depression? In our time and in our places of life, the cult of caution and self-pity is to blame for everything, so now depression and panic attacks dominate – take less caution and pity yourself less? Behind every seemingly spontaneous social movement created are certain people who created it for pragmatic reasons? Does your character affect your fate and the fate of those around you? Everyone is an IT-person at a biological level – does everyone program people? Managing people is simple: are they all drawn to the one who can fill their body with hormones of pleasure, or the one who can remove the chemicals that cause a bad mood from their body? Can’t you sew a fur coat from words or can you sew with some? Quantum physics is right – everything is simple, because as you can educate someone, you can educate someone who has more knowledge and will, that educates him, and the world consists of those whom someone educated in in the same way in which they are now?