Astronomical Curiosities: Facts and Fallacies

CHAPTER IX

Saturn

To show the advantages of large telescopes over small ones, Mr. C. Roberts says that “with the 25-inch refractor of the Cambridge Observatory the view of the planet Saturn is indescribably glorious; everything I had ever seen before was visible at a glance, and an enormous amount of detail that I had never even glimpsed before, after a few minutes’ observation.”155

Chacornac found that the illumination of Saturn’s disc is the reverse of that of Jupiter, the edges of Saturn being brighter than the centre of the disc, while in the case of Jupiter – as in that of the sun – the edges are fainter than the centre.156 According to Mr. Denning, Saturn bears satisfactorily “greater magnifying power than either Mars or Jupiter.”157

At an occultation of Saturn by the moon, which occurred on June 13, 1900, M. M. Honorat noticed the great contrast between the slightly yellowish colour of the moon and the greenish tint of the planet.158

In the year 1892, when the rings of Saturn had nearly disappeared, Prof. L. W. Underwood, of the Underwood Observatory, Appleton, Wisconsin (U.S.A.), saw one of Saturn’s satellites (Titan) apparently moving along the needlelike appendage to the planet presented by the rings. “The apparent diameter of the satellite so far exceeded the apparent thickness of the ring that it gave the appearance of a beautiful golden bead moving very slowly along a fine golden thread.”159

In 1907, when the rings of Saturn became invisible in ordinary telescopes, Professor Campbell, observing with the great Lick telescope, noticed “prominent bright knots, visible … in Saturn’s rings. The knots were symmetrically placed, two being to the east and two to the west.” This was confirmed by Mr. Lowell, who says, “Condensations in Saturn’s rings confirmed here and measured repeatedly. Symmetric and permanent.” This phenomenon was previously seen by Bond in the years 1847-56. Measures of these light spots made by Prof. Barnard with the 40-inch Yerkes telescope show that the outer one corresponded in position with the outer edge of the middle ring close to the Cassini division, and the inner condensation, curious to say, seemed to coincide in position with the “crape ring.” Prof. Barnard thinks that the thickness of the rings “must be greatly under 100 miles, and probably less than 50 miles,” and he says —

“The important fact clearly brought out at this apparition of Saturn is that the bright rings are not opaque to the light of the sun – and this is really what we should expect from the nature of their constitution as shown by the theory of Clerk Maxwell, and the spectroscopic results of Keeler.”160

Under certain conditions it would be theoretically possible, according to Mr. Whitmell, to see the globe of Saturn through the Cassini division in the ring. But the observation would be one of great difficulty and delicacy. The effect would be that, of the arc of the division which crosses the planet’s disc, “a small portion will appear bright instead of dark, and may almost disappear.”161

A remarkable white spot was seen on Saturn on June 23, 1903, by Prof. Barnard, and afterwards by Mr. Denning.162 Another white spot was seen by Denning on July 9 of the same year.163 From numerous observations of these spots, Denning found a rotation period for the planet of about 10h 39m 21s.164 From observations of the same spots Signor Comas Sola found a period 10h 38m·4, a close agreement with Denning’s result. For Saturn’s equator, Prof. Hill found a rotation period of 10h 14m 23s·8, so that – as in the case of Jupiter – the rotation is faster at the equator than in the northern latitudes of the planet. A similar phenomenon is observed in the sun. Mr. Denning’s results were fully confirmed by Herr Leo Brenner, and other German astronomers.165

Photographs taken by Prof. V. M. Slipher in America show that the spectrum of Saturn is similar to that of Jupiter. None of the bands observed in the planet’s spectrum are visible in the spectrum of the rings. This shows that if the rings possess an atmosphere at all, it must be much rarer than that surrounding the ball of the planet. Prof. Slipher says that “none of the absorption bands in the spectrum of Saturn can be identified with those bands due to absorption in the earth’s atmosphere,” and there is no trace of aqueous vapour.166

In September, 1907, M. G. Fournier suspected the existence of a “faint transparent and luminous ring” outside the principal rings of Saturn. He thinks that it may possibly be subject to periodical fluctuations of brightness, sometimes being visible and sometimes not.167 This dusky ring was again suspected at the Geneva Observatory in October, 1908.168 M. Schaer found it a difficult object with a 16-inch Cassegrain reflector. Prof. Stromgen at Copenhagen, and Prof. Hartwig at Bamberg, however, failed to see any trace of the supposed ring.169 It was seen at Greenwich in October, 1908.

A “dark transit” of Saturn’s satellite Titan across the disc of the planet has been observed on several occasions. It was seen by Mr. Isaac W. Ward, of Belfast, on March 27, 1892, with a 4·3-inch Wray refractor. The satellite appeared smaller than its shadow. The phenomenon was also seen on March 12 of the same year by the Rev. A. Freeman, Mr. Mee, and M. F. Terby; and again on November 6, 1907, by Mr. Paul Chauleur and Mr. A. B. Cobham.170

The recently discovered tenth satellite of Saturn, Themis, was discovered by photography, and has never been seen by the eye even with the largest telescopes! But its existence is beyond all doubt, and its orbit round the planet has been calculated.

Prof. Hussey of the Lick Observatory finds that Saturn’s satellite Mimas is probably larger than Hyperion. He also finds from careful measurements that the diameter of Titan is certainly overestimated, and that its probable diameter is about 2500 miles.171

The French astronomer, M. Lucien Rudaux, finds the following variation in the light of the satellites of Saturn: —

The variation of light is, he thinks, due to the fact that the period of rotation of each satellite is equal to that of their revolution round the planet; as in the case of our moon.172

The names of the satellites of Saturn are derived from the ancient heathen mythology. They are given in order of distance from the planet, the nearest being Mimas and the farthest Themis.

1. Mimas was a Trojan born at the same time as Paris.

2. Enceladus was son of Tartarus and Ge.

3. Tethys was wife of Oceanus, god of ocean currents. She became mother of all the chief rivers in the universe, as also the Oceanides or sea nymphs.

4. Dione was one of the wives of Zeus.

5. Rhea was a daughter of Uranus. She married Saturn, and became the mother of Vesta, Ceres, Juno, and Pluto.

6. Titan was the eldest son of Uranus.

7. Hyperion was the god of day, and the father of sun and moon.

8. Japetus was the fifth son of Uranus, and father of Atlas and Prometheus.173

9. Phœbe was daughter of Uranus and Ge.

10. Themis was daughter of Uranus and Ge, and, therefore, sister of Phœbe.

In a review of Prof. Comstock’s Text Book of Astronomy in The Observatory, November, 1901, the remark occurs, “We are astonished to see that Mr. Comstock alludes with apparent seriousness to the nine satellites of Saturn. As regards the ninth satellite, we thought that all astronomers held with Mrs. Betsy Prig on the subject of this astronomical Mrs. Harris.” This reads curiously now (1909) when the existence of the ninth satellite (Phœbe) has been fully confirmed, and a tenth satellite discovered.

CHAPTER X

Uranus and Neptune

From observations of Uranus made in 1896, M. Leo Brenner concluded that the planet rotates on its axis in about 8½ hours (probably 8h 27m). This is a short period, but considering the short periods of Jupiter and Saturn there seems to be nothing improbable about it.

Prof. Barnard finds that the two inner satellites of Uranus are difficult objects even with the great 36-inch telescope of the Lick Observatory! They have, however, been photographed at Cambridge (U.S.A.) with a 13-inch lens, although they are “among the most difficult objects known.”174

Sir William Huggins in 1871 found strong absorption lines (six strong lines) in the spectrum of Uranus. One of these lines indicated the presence of hydrogen, a gas which does not exist in our atmosphere. Three of the other lines seen were situated near lines in the spectrum of atmospheric air. Neither carbonic acid nor sodium showed any indications of their presence in the planet’s spectrum. A photograph by Prof. Slipher of Neptune’s spectrum “shows the spectrum of this planet to contain many strong absorption bands. These bands are so pronounced in the part of the spectrum between the Fraunhofer lines F and D, as to leave the solar spectrum unrecognizable… Neptune’s spectrum is strikingly different from that of Uranus, the bands in the latter planet all being reinforced in Neptune. In this planet there are also new bands which have not been observed in any of the other planets. The F line of hydrogen is remarkably dark … this band is of more than solar strength in the spectrum of Uranus also. Thus free hydrogen seems to be present in the atmosphere of both these planets. This and the other dark bands in these planets bear evidence of an enveloping atmosphere of gases which is quite unlike that which surrounds the earth.”175

With the 18-inch equatorial telescope of the Strasburgh Observatory, M. Wirtz measured the diameter of Neptune, and found from forty-nine measures made between December 9, 1902, and March 28, 1903, a value of 2″·303 at a distance of 30·1093 (earth’s distance from sun = 1). This gives a diameter of 50,251 kilometres, or about 31,225 miles,176 and a mean density of 1·54 (water = 1; earth’s mean density = 5·53). Prof. Barnard’s measures gave a diameter of 32,900 miles, a fairly close agreement, considering the difficulty of measuring so small a disc as that shown by Neptune.

The satellite of Neptune was photographed at the Pulkown Observatory in the year 1899. The name Triton has been suggested for it. In the old Greek mythology Triton was a son of Neptune, so the name would be an appropriate one.

The existence of a second satellite of Neptune is suspected by Prof. Schaeberle, who thinks he once saw it with the 36-inch telescope of the Lick Observatory “on an exceptionally fine night” in 1895.177 But this supposed discovery has not yet been confirmed. Lassell also thought he had discovered a second satellite, but this supposed discovery was never confirmed.[178]

The ancient Burmese mention eight planets, the sun, the moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and another named Râhu, which is invisible. It has been surmised that “Râhu” is Uranus, which is just visible to the naked eye, and may possibly have been discovered by keen eyesight in ancient times. The present writer has seen it several times without optical aid in the West of Ireland, and with a binocular field-glass of 2 inches aperture he found it quite a conspicuous object.

When Neptune was visually discovered by Galle, at Berlin, he was assisted in his observation by Prof. d’Arrest. The incident is thus described by Dr. Dreyer, “On the night of June 14, 1874, while observing Coggia’s comet together, I reminded Prof. d’Arrest how he had once said in the course of a lecture, that he had been present at the finding of Neptune, and that ‘he might say it would not have been found without him.’ He then told me (and I wrote it down the next day), how he had suggested the use of Bremiker’s map (as first mentioned by Dr. Galle in 1877) and continued, ‘We then went back to the dome, where there was a kind of desk, at which I placed myself with the map, while Galle, looking through the refractor, described the configurations of the stars he saw. I followed them on the map one by one, until he said: “And then there is a star of the 8th magnitude, in such and such a position,” whereupon I immediately exclaimed: “That star is not on the map.”’”178 This was the planet. But it seems to the present writer that if Galle or d’Arrest had access to Harding’s Atlas (as they probably had) they might easily have found the planet with a good binocular field-glass. As a matter of fact Neptune is shown in Harding’s Atlas (1822) as a star of the 8th magnitude, having been mistaken for a star by Lalande on May 8 and 10, 1795; and the present writer has found Harding’s 8th magnitude stars quite easy objects with a binocular field-glass having object-glasses of two inches diameter, and a power of about six diameters.

Supposed Planet beyond Neptune. – The possible existence of a planet beyond Neptune has been frequently suggested. From considerations on the aphelia of certain comets, Prof. Forbes in 1880 computed the probable position of such a body. He thought this hypothetical planet would be considerably larger than Jupiter, and probably revolve round the sun at a distance of about 100 times the earth’s mean distance from the sun. The place indicated was between R.A. 11h 24m and 12h 12m, and declination 0° 0′ to 6° 0′ north. With a view to its discovery, the late Dr. Roberts took a series of eighteen photographs covering the region indicated. The result of an examination of these photographs showed, Dr. Roberts says, that “no planet of greater brightness than a star of the 15th magnitude exists on the sky area herein indicated.” Prof. W. H. Pickering has recently revived the question, and has arrived at the following results: Mean distance of the planet from the sun, 51·9 (earth’s mean distance = 1); period of revolution, 373½ years; mass about twice the earth’s mass; probable position for 1909 about R.A. 7h 47m, north declination 21°, or about 5° south-east of the star κ Geminorum. The supposed planet would be faint, its brightness being from 11½ to 13½, according to the “albedo” (or reflecting power) it may have.179

Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.

1

Comptes Rendus, 1903, December 7.

2

Nature, April 11, 1907.

3

Astrophysical Journal, vol. 19 (1904), p. 39.

4

Astrophysical Journal, vol. 21 (1905), p. 260.

5

Knowledge, July, 1902, p. 132.

6

Nature, April 30, 1903.

7

Ibid., May 18, 1905.

8

Ibid., May 18, 1905.

9

Nature, June 29, 1871.

10

Nature, October 15, 1903.

11

The Life of the Universe (1909), vol. ii. p. 209.

12

The World Machine, p. 234.

13

Quoted in The Observatory, March 1908, p. 125.

14

The Observatory, September, 1906.

15

Nature, March 1, 1900.

16

Cycle of Celestial Objects, p. 96.

17

Ast. Nach. No. 3737.

18

Observatory, September, 1906.

19

Nature, November 29 and December 20, 1894.

20

Bulletin, Ast. Soc. de France, July, 1898.

21

Observatory, vol. 8 (1885), pp. 306-7.

22

Nature, October 30, 1902.

23

Charles Lane Poor, The Solar System, p. 170.

24

Smyth, Celestial Cycle, p. 60.

25

Denning, Telescopic Work for Starlight Evenings, p. 225.

26

The Observatory, 1894, p. 395.

27

Ast. Nach. 4333, quoted in Nature, July 1, 1909, p. 20.

28

English Mechanic, July 23, 1909.

29

Nature, December 22, 1892.

30

Celestial Objects, vol. i. p. 52, footnote.

31

Ibid., p. 54.

32

Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1892, p. 618.

33

Nature, August 7, 1879.

34

The World of Space, p. 56.

35

Nature, September 15, 1892.

36

Observatory, 1880, p. 574.

37

Knowledge, November 1, 1897, pp. 260, 261.

38

Worlds in the Making, p. 61.

39

Ibid., p. 48.

40

Nature, June 1, 1876.

41

Cel. Objects, vol. i. p. 66 (5th Edition).

42

Celestial Objects, vol. i. p. 65 (5th Edition).

43

Ast. Nach. No. 1863.

44

Nature, June 1, 1876.

45

Ibid., June 8, 1876.

46

Nature, October 17, 1895.

47

Ibid., July 27, 1905.

48

Nature, October 6, 1887.

49

Ast. Nach., No. 4106.

50

Copernicus, vol. ii. p. 168.

51

Cosmos, vol. iv. p. 476, footnote.

52

Denning, Telescopic Work for Starlight Evenings, p. 153.

53

Ibid., p. 154.

54

Nature, July 13, 1876.

55

P. M. Ryves in Knowledge, June 1, 1897, p. 144.

56

Bulletin, Ast. Soc. de France, August, 1905.

57

Nature, April 5, 1894.

58

Nature, May 14, 1896. Some have attributed these “luminous clouds” to light reflected from the dust of the Krakatoa eruption (1883).

59

The Observatory, 1877, p. 90.

60

Popular Astronomy, vol. 11 (1903), p. 293.

61

Popular Astronomy, vol. 13 (1905), p. 226.

62

Nature, July 25, 1901 (from Flammarion).

63

Popular Astronomy, vol. 11 (1903), p. 496.

64

Kinetic Theories of Gravitation, Washington, 1877.

65

The Observatory, June, 1894, p. 208.

66

Nature, June 8, 1899.

67

Astrophysical Journal, vol. 14 (1901), p. 238, footnote.

68

Mars as the Abode of Life, p. 52.

69

Second Book of the Maccabees v. 1-4 (Revised Edition).

70

Humboldt’s Cosmos, vol. i. p. 169 (Otté’s translation).

71

Quoted by Grant in History of Physical Astronomy, p. 71.

72

Ibid., pp. 100, 101.

73

Exposition du Système du Monde, quoted by Carl Snyder in The World Machine, p. 226.

74

Worlds in the Making, p. 63.

75

Cosmos, vol. i. p. 131.

76

The Observatory, June, 1909, p. 261.

77

Astronomical Essays, pp. 61, 62.

78

Encyclopædia Britannica (Schiraz).

79

Monthly Notices, R.A.S., February, 1905.

80

Nature, March 3, 1870.

81

Ibid., March 31, 1870, p. 557.

82

Prof. W. H. Pickering found 12 times (see p. 1).

83

Nature, January 30, 1908.

84

Nature, September 5, 1901.

85

Ibid., July 31, 1890.

86

Nature, October 16, 1884.

87

Nature, February 19, 1885.

88

Nature, January 14, 1909, p. 323.

89

Photographic Atlas of the Moon, Annals of Harvard Observatory, vol. li. pp. 14, 15.

90

Nature, January 18, 1906.

91

Humboldt’s Cosmos, vol. iv. p. 481.

92

Ibid., p. 482.

93

Monthly Notices, R.A.S., June, 1895.

94

Humboldt’s Cosmos, vol. iv. p. 483 (Otté’s translation).

95

Grant, History of Physical Astronomy, p. 229.

96

Popular Astronomy, vol. xvii. No. 6, p. 387 (June-July, 1909).

97

Nature, October 7, 1875.

98

Mars as an Abode of Life (1908), p. 281.

99

Knowledge, May 2, 1886.

100

Nature, March 12, 1908.

101

Bulletin, Ast. Soc. de France, April, 1899.

102

Astronomy and Astrophysics (1894), p. 649.

103

Nature, April 20, 1905.

104

Astrophysical Journal, vol. 14 (1901), p. 258.

105

Nature, August 22, 1907.

106

Popular Astronomy, vol. 12 (1904), p. 679.

107

Mars as an Abode of Life, p. 69.

108

Ibid., p. 146.

109

Worlds in the Making, p. 49.

110

Worlds in the Making, p. 53.

111

Denning, Telescopic Work for Starlight Evenings, p. 158.

112

Ibid., p. 166.

113

Nature, July 13, 1876.

114

Nature, May 2, 1907.

115

Nature, May 30, 1907.

116

Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, August, 1908.

117

Monthly Notices, R.A.S., 1902, p. 291.

118

Monthly Notices, R.A.S., February, 1902, p. 291.

119